Howard Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences Theory: A Guide for Early Years

A Comprehensive Guide for Early Years Professionals and Students

Howard Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences has added a different perspective to our understanding of human cognition and learning. For Early Years professionals, educators, and students, Gardner’s work offers a powerful framework for nurturing diverse talents and abilities in young children.

Gardner’s theory challenges the traditional view of intelligence as a single, fixed entity. Instead, it proposes eight distinct intelligences: linguistic, logical-mathematical, musical, bodily-kinesthetic, spatial, interpersonal, intrapersonal, and naturalistic. This pluralistic view of intelligence has profound implications for Early Years practice, curriculum design, and assessment methods.

Key impacts of Gardner’s theory include:

• Recognition of diverse learning styles and strengths
• Development of more inclusive educational approaches
• Enhanced personalisation of learning experiences
• Broader, more holistic assessment methods

For Early Years professionals, educators, and students, Gardner’s theory offers valuable insights into nurturing the diverse talents and abilities of young children. By recognising and supporting multiple intelligences, practitioners can enhance engagement, improve learning outcomes, and support holistic development alongside other methods.

This comprehensive guide explores Gardner’s theory in depth, covering:

1. Gardner’s background and key concepts
2. Practical applications in Early Years settings
3. Critiques and limitations of the theory
4. Ongoing influence and future directions

Whether you’re a seasoned Early Years professional or a student embarking on your educational journey, this article provides the knowledge and tools to implement Gardner’s groundbreaking ideas in your practice. Discover how the Theory of Multiple Intelligences can transform your approach to early childhood education and development.

Download this Article as a PDF

Download this article as a PDF so you can revisit it whenever you want. We’ll email you a download link.

You’ll also get notification of our FREE Early Years TV videos each week.

Get your PDF Download and FREE Early Years TV Updates

Introduction and Background to Howard Gardner’s Work

Howard Gardner revolutionised educational theory with his concept of multiple intelligences. His work challenges traditional views of intelligence, adding new perspectives to the Early Years education and beyond. This article explores Gardner’s theories, their practical applications, and their enduring influence on child development and learning.

Early Life and Education

Howard Gardner was born on 11 July 1943 in Scranton, Pennsylvania. He grew up in a Jewish family that had fled Nazi Germany, an experience that shaped his worldview. Gardner excelled academically, studying at Harvard University where he earned his BA in 1965 and his PhD in 1971 (Gardner, 2011).

Career and Achievements

Gardner’s professional journey began at Harvard Project Zero, where he now serves as senior director. He is the John H. and Elisabeth A. Hobbs Research Professor of Cognition and Education at the Harvard Graduate School of Education.

Notable achievements:

• MacArthur Fellowship (1981)
• Grawemeyer Award in Education (1990)
• 30 honorary degrees from institutions worldwide

Historical Context

Gardner developed his theories during a time when IQ tests dominated assessments of intelligence. The 1970s and 1980s saw growing criticism of these narrow measures, with educators seeking more comprehensive understanding of human cognitive abilities (Armstrong, 2009).

Prevailing ideas of the time:

• Single, general intelligence (g factor)
• IQ tests as primary measure of cognitive ability
• Standardised testing in education

Key Influences

Gardner’s work was influenced by:

1. Cognitive revolution in psychology
2. Developmental psychology of Jean Piaget
3. Observations of brain-damaged patients

These influences led Gardner to question traditional notions of intelligence and explore a more pluralistic view of cognitive abilities (Gardner, 1983).

Main Concepts and Theories

Gardner’s most significant contribution is the Theory of Multiple Intelligences, first proposed in his 1983 book “Frames of Mind”. This theory posits that intelligence is not a single, fixed entity but comprises multiple, distinct capacities.

The original seven intelligences:

• Linguistic
• Logical-mathematical
• Musical
• Bodily-kinesthetic
• Spatial
• Interpersonal
• Intrapersonal

Gardner later added naturalistic intelligence and has considered existential intelligence as a potential ninth type (Gardner, 1999).

This theory challenges traditional educational approaches, advocating for diverse teaching methods to cater to different learning styles. It has significant implications for Early Years education, emphasising the importance of nurturing various intelligences from a young age.

Howard Gardner’s Key Concepts and Theories

Howard Gardner’s work centres on the Theory of Multiple Intelligences, which changed the contemporary understanding of human cognitive abilities. This theory challenged the traditional view of intelligence as a single, fixed entity measured by IQ tests. Gardner’s ideas have significantly influenced educational practices, particularly in Early Years settings, by promoting a more inclusive and diverse approach to learning and development.

The Theory of Multiple Intelligences

The Original Seven Intelligences

1. Linguistic Intelligence: Involves sensitivity to spoken and written language, the ability to learn languages, and the capacity to use language to accomplish certain goals.
2. Logical-Mathematical Intelligence: Consists of the capacity to analyse problems logically, carry out mathematical operations, and investigate issues scientifically.
3. Musical Intelligence: Entails skill in the performance, composition, and appreciation of musical patterns.
4. Bodily-Kinesthetic Intelligence: Encompasses the potential of using one’s whole body or parts of the body to solve problems or fashion products.
5. Spatial Intelligence: Involves the potential to recognise and manipulate the patterns of wide space as well as the patterns of more confined areas.
6. Interpersonal Intelligence: Denotes a person’s capacity to understand the intentions, motivations, and desires of other people and to work effectively with others.
7. Intrapersonal Intelligence: Entails the capacity to understand oneself, to have an effective working model of oneself—including one’s own desires, fears, and capacities—and to use such information effectively in regulating one’s own life.

Additional Intelligences

In later works, Gardner proposed additional intelligences:

8. Naturalistic Intelligence: The ability to recognise, categorise and draw upon certain features of the environment.
9. Existential Intelligence: The capacity to tackle deep questions about human existence, such as the meaning of life, why we die, and how we got here (Gardner, 1999).

Key Principles of Multiple Intelligences Theory

1. All individuals possess all intelligences: Every person has capabilities in all nine intelligences.
2. Intelligences can be developed: With appropriate encouragement, enrichment, and instruction, intelligences can be strengthened over a lifetime.
3. Intelligences work together in complex ways: No intelligence exists by itself in life. They always interact with each other.
4. There are many ways to be intelligent: There is no standard set of attributes that one must have to be considered intelligent in a specific area.

Implications for Early Years Education

Gardner’s theory has profound implications for Early Years education:

• Diverse teaching methods: Educators should use varied approaches to cater to different intelligences.
• Individualised learning: Recognising each child’s unique intelligence profile allows for personalised educational strategies.
• Broader assessment: Evaluation should go beyond traditional tests to include diverse measures of intelligence.

Project Spectrum

Building on the Multiple Intelligences theory, Gardner and colleagues developed Project Spectrum, an approach to assessment and curriculum development for young children (Gardner et al., 1998).

Key features of Project Spectrum:

• Emphasis on observation and documentation of children’s strengths
• Use of intelligence-fair assessments
• Creation of learning environments that support multiple intelligences

Relationships Between Concepts

Gardner’s theories are interconnected, with the Theory of Multiple Intelligences serving as the foundation. Project Spectrum applies these ideas practically in Early Years settings, demonstrating how understanding diverse intelligences can shape educational practices.

The theories collectively promote a more holistic view of intelligence and learning, encouraging educators to recognise and nurture a wide range of abilities in young children. This approach supports individualised learning and helps children develop confidence in their unique strengths.

Howard Gardner’s Contributions to the Field of Education and Child Development

Impact on Educational Practices

Howard Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences has significantly influenced educational practices worldwide. His ideas have led to more inclusive and diverse approaches to teaching and learning, particularly in Early Years settings.

Key impacts include:

• Diversification of teaching methods: Educators now employ a wider range of instructional strategies to cater to different intelligences.
• Personalised learning: Schools have adopted more individualised approaches to education. The Reggio Emilia approach, which aligns with Gardner’s theories, allows children to explore their interests and strengths through project-based learning (Edwards et al., 2012). Read our in-depth article on The Reggio Emilia approach here.
• Enriched learning environments: Classrooms have been redesigned to accommodate multiple intelligences.
• Alternative assessment methods: Educators have moved beyond traditional testing. Portfolio assessments, which showcase a child’s work across various intelligences, have gained popularity in Early Years settings.

Shaping our Understanding of Child Development

Gardner’s work has deepened our understanding of child development, offering new perspectives on how children learn and grow.

Key contributions include:

• Recognising diverse cognitive strengths: Gardner’s theory highlights that children possess different cognitive strengths. This has led to a more nuanced understanding of cognitive development, moving beyond Piaget’s stage theory (Gardner & Moran, 2006).
• Emphasising social and emotional intelligence: By including interpersonal and intrapersonal intelligences, Gardner’s work has underscored the importance of social and emotional development in early childhood. This has influenced programmes like the PATHS curriculum, which focuses on promoting social and emotional competence in young children (Greenberg et al., 2017).
• Linking cognitive development to real-world skills: Gardner’s theory connects cognitive abilities to practical skills and real-world problem-solving. This has influenced approaches like the project-based learning method used in many Early Years settings (Katz & Chard, 2000).

Relevance to Contemporary Education

Gardner’s ideas remain highly relevant to contemporary education, influencing current practices and research.

Current applications include:

• Technology integration: Gardner’s theory has informed the development of educational technology.
• Inclusive education: The multiple intelligences framework supports inclusive education practices.
• 21st-century skills development: Gardner’s ideas align with the emphasis on developing 21st-century skills. The ‘Maker Movement’ in education, which encourages hands-on creation and problem-solving, draws on multiple intelligences theory to foster creativity and innovation (Martinez & Stager, 2019).
• Personalised digital learning: Adaptive learning platforms, which tailor content to individual learners’ needs and preferences, often incorporate principles from multiple intelligences theory.

Criticisms and Limitations of Howard Gardner’s Theories and Concepts

Howard Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences has significantly influenced educational practices and our understanding of child development. However, it has also faced various criticisms and limitations. This section examines these critiques to provide a balanced view of Gardner’s work and its applications in Early Years settings.

Criticisms of Research Methods

Gardner’s research methods have been scrutinised by fellow academics and practitioners:

• Lack of empirical evidence: Critics argue that Gardner’s theory lacks robust empirical support. Waterhouse (2006) points out that there is insufficient evidence to validate the existence of eight distinct intelligences.
• Subjectivity in intelligence identification: The process of identifying and categorising intelligences has been criticised as subjective. Sternberg (1983) suggests that Gardner’s criteria for intelligence are not consistently applied across all proposed intelligences.
• Limited longitudinal studies: There is a scarcity of long-term studies tracking the development of multiple intelligences over time, making it challenging to understand how these intelligences evolve throughout childhood and beyond.

Challenges to Key Concepts or Theories

Several aspects of Gardner’s theory have been challenged:

• Overlap between intelligences: Critics argue that some of Gardner’s proposed intelligences significantly overlap, questioning their distinctiveness. For instance, musical and mathematical intelligences often show correlations in cognitive studies (Schellenberg, 2004).
• Intelligence or talents?: Some researchers suggest that Gardner’s intelligences might be better described as talents or aptitudes rather than distinct forms of intelligence (White, 2008).
• Implications for educational practice: While the theory has been widely embraced in education, some argue that its practical applications in the classroom are not always clear or evidence-based (Waterhouse, 2006).

Contextual and Cultural Limitations

Gardner’s theory has been critiqued for its cultural context:

• Western-centric perspective: The theory has been criticised for potentially reflecting a Western-centric view of intelligence and not fully accounting for diverse cultural understandings of cognitive abilities (Sternberg, 2004).
• Socioeconomic considerations: Critics argue that the theory does not adequately address how socioeconomic factors might influence the development and expression of different intelligences (Kornhaber, 2004).
• Environmental influences: Some researchers suggest that Gardner’s theory underemphasises the role of environmental factors in shaping intelligence (Brody, 2004).

Addressing the Criticisms and Limitations in Practice

Despite these criticisms, Gardner’s work continues to offer valuable insights for Early Years practitioners:

• Flexible application: Educators can use the theory as a framework for understanding diverse learning styles while remaining open to other perspectives.
• Cultural responsiveness: Practitioners can adapt the application of multiple intelligences theory to reflect the cultural context of their setting.
• Complementary approaches: Early Years professionals can combine Gardner’s ideas with other theories and research findings.
• Ongoing reflection and research: Educators should stay informed about current research and critically reflect on their practice.

By acknowledging these limitations and adopting a flexible, culturally responsive approach, Early Years practitioners can harness the strengths of Gardner’s theory while mitigating its potential shortcomings.

Practical Applications of Howard Gardner’s Work

Howard Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences offers numerous practical applications for Early Years settings. Implementing these ideas can enhance children’s learning experiences, support their diverse strengths, and foster holistic development. This section explores concrete strategies for applying Gardner’s work in curriculum design, classroom management, and family engagement.

Application in Curriculum and Lesson Planning

Gardner’s theory informs curriculum design by encouraging a diverse approach to learning:

• Multi-modal lesson planning: Educators create lessons that engage multiple intelligences simultaneously. For example, a setting could develop a ‘Shapes in Nature’ project where children explored geometric shapes through outdoor exploration (naturalistic), drawing (spatial), counting (logical-mathematical), and singing shape-themed songs (musical)
• Intelligence-specific learning centres: Classrooms are organised into areas that cater to different intelligences. A setting could set up ‘intelligence stations’ including a reading nook (linguistic), a mini-lab (logical-mathematical), and a drama corner (bodily-kinesthetic and interpersonal).
• Project-based learning: Long-term projects allow children to engage deeply with topics across multiple intelligences. A setting could implement a ‘Community Helpers’ project where children role-played different professions (bodily-kinesthetic), created maps of their community (spatial), and wrote stories about community workers (linguistic).
• Personalised learning paths: Educators use observations of children’s preferred intelligences to tailor learning experiences.

Strategies for Classroom Management and Interaction

Gardner’s ideas influence approaches to classroom management and social-emotional development:

• Intelligence-based conflict resolution: Children are encouraged to use their strongest intelligences to solve conflicts.
• Multi-intelligence feedback: Educators provide feedback and praise that recognises different types of intelligence. For example, a setting may find that acknowledging children’s diverse strengths improved self-esteem and motivation.
• Collaborative learning groups: Children are grouped based on complementary intelligences for collaborative tasks.
• Emotional intelligence focus: Incorporating activities that develop interpersonal and intrapersonal intelligences supports social-emotional growth.

Engaging Families and Communities

Gardner’s theory provides a framework for meaningful family and community engagement:

• Multiple intelligences home activities: Nurseries provide families with ideas for activities that support different intelligences at home. A nursery could create ‘Intelligence Backpacks’ filled with materials and instructions for home-based learning across various intelligences.
• Parent workshops on multiple intelligences: Educators organise sessions to explain Gardner’s theory and its applications.
• Community talent sharing: Local community members are invited to share their expertise, demonstrating real-world applications of different intelligences.
• Multiple intelligences progress reports: Nurseries adapt their reporting methods to reflect children’s progress across different intelligences.

Overcoming Challenges and Barriers to Implementation

Applying Gardner’s theory in practice can present challenges:

• Resource constraints: Educators adapt materials creatively to support multiple intelligences.
• Time management: Integrating multiple intelligences into daily routines requires efficient planning.
• Staff training: Ongoing professional development is crucial for effective implementation.
• Assessment challenges: Evaluating progress across multiple intelligences requires innovative approaches.

By creatively adapting Gardner’s ideas to their specific contexts, Early Years professionals can overcome these challenges and harness the theory’s potential to enrich children’s learning experiences.

Comparing Howard Gardner’s Ideas with Other Theorists

Understanding Howard Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences in relation to other prominent theories enhances our comprehension of child development. This section compares Gardner’s work with that of Jean Piaget, Lev Vygotsky, and Daniel Goleman, highlighting similarities, differences, and practical implications for Early Years settings.

Comparison with Jean Piaget

Jean Piaget’s cognitive development theory focuses on how children’s thinking evolves through distinct stages.

Similarities:

• Developmental perspective: Both Gardner and Piaget view development as a process that unfolds over time.
• Active learning: Both theorists emphasise children’s active role in constructing knowledge.
• Individual differences: Both acknowledge variations in children’s developmental trajectories.

Differences:

• Nature of intelligence: Piaget posits a single, general intelligence, while Gardner proposes multiple, distinct intelligences.
• Developmental stages: Piaget outlines fixed stages of cognitive development, whereas Gardner’s theory is less stage-dependent.
• Cultural influences: Gardner places greater emphasis on cultural context in shaping intelligence.

Example: A nursery could incorporate both theories by using Piagetian conservation tasks across Gardner’s multiple intelligences, such as musical conservation (pitch) and spatial conservation (volume).

Read our in-depth article on Jean Piaget here.

Comparison with Lev Vygotsky

Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory emphasises the role of social interaction and culture in cognitive development.

Similarities:

• Social context: Both Gardner and Vygotsky recognise the importance of social and cultural factors in learning.
• Potential for development: Both theories acknowledge children’s capacity for growth beyond their current abilities.
• Role of tools: Both emphasise the use of cultural tools (e.g., language, symbols) in cognitive development.

Differences:

• Focus of development: Vygotsky centres on social interaction, while Gardner emphasises individual cognitive strengths.
• Zone of Proximal Development: Vygotsky’s concept of ZPD is not explicitly addressed in Gardner’s theory.
• Language emphasis: Vygotsky places greater emphasis on language in cognitive development.

Example: A nursery could combine Vygotsky’s scaffolding approach with Gardner’s multiple intelligences, creating ‘intelligence zones’ where peers and adults support children’s learning across different domains.

Read our in-depth article on Lev Vygotsky here.

Comparison with Daniel Goleman

Goleman’s Emotional Intelligence theory focuses on the importance of emotional and social skills.

Similarities:

• Multiple aspects of intelligence: Both Gardner and Goleman argue for a broader conception of intelligence beyond traditional IQ.
• Interpersonal skills: Both theories recognise the importance of understanding and interacting with others.
• Intrapersonal awareness: Both emphasise self-understanding as a crucial aspect of intelligence.

Differences:

• Scope of theory: Gardner’s theory covers a broader range of intelligences, while Goleman focuses specifically on emotional and social aspects.
• Malleability: Goleman argues that emotional intelligence can be significantly developed, while Gardner sees intelligences as more stable.
• Practical applications: Goleman’s theory has been widely applied in professional settings, while Gardner’s has had more impact in educational contexts.

Synthesis and Implications for Practice

Comparing these theories reveals complementary insights into child development:

• Holistic approach: Combining Gardner’s multiple intelligences with Piaget’s cognitive stages, Vygotsky’s social emphasis, and Goleman’s emotional focus provides a comprehensive framework for understanding child development.
• Individualised learning: Gardner’s theory, supported by Piagetian and Vygotskian concepts, encourages personalised learning approaches.
• Social-emotional development: Integrating Goleman’s emotional intelligence with Gardner’s interpersonal and intrapersonal intelligences supports children’s social-emotional growth.

Limitations and Challenges of Comparing Theorists

Comparing theories presents challenges:

• Historical context: Each theory emerged from specific historical and cultural contexts, influencing their perspectives and emphases.
• Methodological differences: Variations in research methods and evidence bases complicate direct comparisons.
• Oversimplification risk: Comparisons may oversimplify complex theories, potentially misrepresenting nuanced ideas.

Critical approach: Early Years professionals should approach theoretical comparisons critically, recognising that each theory offers valuable insights while acknowledging their limitations. Reflective practice, ongoing professional development, and staying informed about current research support effective integration of multiple theoretical perspectives in Early Years settings.

Howard Gardner’s Legacy and Ongoing Influence

Howard Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences has left an indelible mark on educational psychology and Early Years practice. His work continues to shape research, policy, and professional practice globally. Understanding Gardner’s enduring influence helps Early Years professionals and students contextualise current approaches and anticipate future trends in child development theory and practice.

Impact on Contemporary Research

Gardner’s ideas have inspired numerous studies and research programmes:

• Neuroscience connections: Recent neuroimaging studies have explored the neural correlates of multiple intelligences. A 2020 study by Shearer and Karanian found distinct neural activity patterns associated with different intelligences, providing preliminary support for Gardner’s theory (Shearer & Karanian, 2017).
• Developmental trajectories: Longitudinal research has investigated how multiple intelligences develop over time.
• Cultural variations: Cross-cultural studies have examined how multiple intelligences manifest in different societies.
• Technology and intelligence: Studies have explored how digital technologies interact with multiple intelligences.

Influence on Educational Policy and Curriculum

Gardner’s theory has significantly influenced educational policies and curricula:

• Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS): The UK’s EYFS framework incorporates elements of multiple intelligences theory, particularly in its emphasis on holistic development across various domains (Department for Education, 2021).
• Scottish Curriculum for Excellence: This curriculum explicitly references Gardner’s work in its approach to personalised learning and recognition of diverse talents (Education Scotland, 2020).
• International Baccalaureate (IB) Primary Years Programme: The IB curriculum integrates multiple intelligences theory into its inquiry-based approach, encouraging exploration across diverse cognitive domains (International Baccalaureate Organization, 2022).
• UNESCO guidelines: UNESCO’s early childhood care and education guidelines advocate for a multiple intelligences approach to support inclusive and culturally responsive practices globally (UNESCO, 2023).

Ongoing Relevance for Professional Practice

Gardner’s ideas continue to inform Early Years practice:

• Multi-modal assessment: Many nurseries have adopted assessment tools that reflect multiple intelligences. A nursery could develop a ‘Multiple Intelligences Profile’ to provide a comprehensive view of each child’s strengths.
• Differentiated instruction: Educators use multiple intelligences theory to tailor teaching strategies.
• Parent engagement: Gardner’s framework provides a common language for discussing children’s strengths with families.
• Inclusive practice: The theory supports inclusive approaches for children with diverse needs.

Current Developments and Future Directions

While Gardner’s legacy is significant, ongoing debates and developments continue:

• Measurement challenges: Researchers are developing more robust tools to measure multiple intelligences.
• Integration with other theories: Current work explores synergies between multiple intelligences and other developmental theories.
• Digital adaptation: As technology becomes more prevalent in Early Years settings, researchers are investigating how to leverage multiple intelligences in digital learning environments.
• Neurodiversity perspective: Emerging research is examining how multiple intelligences theory aligns with neurodiversity paradigms, potentially offering new insights into supporting neurodiverse learners in Early Years settings

Early Years professionals are encouraged to engage critically with Gardner’s ideas, considering both their strengths and limitations. By combining multiple intelligences theory with emerging research and diverse perspectives, practitioners can continue to refine and enhance their approach to supporting young children’s holistic development.

Conclusion

Howard Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences has profoundly influenced our understanding of human cognition and learning. This theory posits that intelligence is not a single, fixed entity but comprises multiple, distinct capacities. Gardner’s work has challenged traditional views of intelligence and education, offering a more inclusive and diverse approach to understanding human potential.

Key contributions:

• Multiple intelligences: Identification of eight (later nine) distinct intelligences
• Pluralistic view of cognition: Recognition of diverse cognitive strengths
• Individualised learning: Emphasis on tailoring education to students’ unique intelligence profiles

Gardner’s ideas have significant implications for Early Years practice. They inform curriculum design, classroom management, and family engagement strategies, promoting a more holistic approach to child development.

Practical applications:

• Multi-modal lesson planning: Engaging multiple intelligences in learning activities
• Intelligence-based learning centres: Creating diverse learning environments
• Personalised learning paths: Tailoring experiences to individual strengths
• Multiple intelligences assessment: Developing comprehensive evaluation tools

Early Years professionals are encouraged to engage critically with Gardner’s theory, recognising both its strengths and limitations. The theory serves as a starting point for reflection and innovation, rather than a rigid framework.

Critical considerations:

• Ongoing research: Staying informed about current studies and critiques
• Cultural responsiveness: Adapting the theory to diverse contexts
• Integration with other theories: Combining multiple intelligences with complementary approaches

Early Years practitioners are invited to apply Gardner’s ideas creatively in their settings, adapting them to their specific contexts and children’s needs. By sharing experiences and insights, professionals contribute to the ongoing evolution of multiple intelligences theory in practice.

Future directions:

• Neuroscience connections: Exploring neural correlates of multiple intelligences
• Technology integration: Leveraging digital tools to support diverse intelligences
• Inclusive practice: Using the theory to support neurodiverse learners

Howard Gardner’s work continues to inspire and guide Early Years practice, offering a rich foundation for nurturing the diverse potentials of young children. As the field evolves, his ideas remain a valuable resource for educators committed to supporting holistic child development.

Frequently Asked Questions

How Can I Identify a Child’s Dominant Intelligence?

Identifying a child’s dominant intelligence involves careful observation and diverse assessment methods:

• Observe play preferences: Notice which activities the child gravitates towards during free play.
• Use multiple assessment tools: Employ a range of activities that tap into different intelligences.
• Consult with parents: Gather information about the child’s interests and strengths at home.
• Document over time: Keep a portfolio of the child’s work across various domains.

Remember, children often exhibit strengths in multiple intelligences. The goal is to recognise and nurture all areas of potential, not to label or limit a child to one intelligence (Armstrong, 2009).

Are Some Intelligences More Important Than Others?

Gardner emphasises that all intelligences are equally valuable:

• Cultural context: The importance of specific intelligences may vary across cultures.
• Individual differences: Each person’s unique profile of intelligences contributes to their overall capabilities.
• Complementary nature: Different intelligences often work together in complex ways.

In Early Years settings, it’s crucial to provide opportunities for children to develop all intelligences, avoiding prioritisation of certain types over others (Gardner, 2006).

How Can Multiple Intelligences Theory Support Inclusive Practice?

Multiple Intelligences theory offers several avenues for supporting inclusive practice:

• Diverse learning approaches: Adapt teaching methods to suit different learning styles.
• Strength-based focus: Emphasise and build upon each child’s unique strengths.
• Alternative assessments: Use varied assessment methods to capture diverse abilities.
• Personalised learning plans: Tailor educational experiences to individual intelligence profiles.

Does Gardner’s Theory Apply to Children with Special Educational Needs?

Gardner’s theory is particularly relevant for children with special educational needs:

• Broader view of intelligence: Recognises abilities beyond traditional academic measures.
• Individualised approach: Supports tailoring education to each child’s unique profile.
• Strength-based interventions: Focuses on developing areas of strength alongside addressing challenges.

How Does Technology Fit into the Multiple Intelligences Framework?

Technology offers new opportunities to engage multiple intelligences:

• Digital tools: Use apps and software that target different intelligences.
• Virtual environments: Create immersive experiences that engage spatial and bodily-kinesthetic intelligences.
• Adaptive learning: Employ AI-driven platforms that adjust to individual intelligence profiles.
• Creative expression: Utilise digital media for musical, visual, and linguistic expression.

Can Multiple Intelligences Theory Help With Supporting Children and Understanding Their Behaviour?

Multiple Intelligences theory offers innovative approaches to supporting and understanding their behaviour:

• Engagement through strengths: Address behavioural issues by engaging children through their dominant intelligences.
• Diverse calming strategies: Offer varied calming activities that appeal to different intelligences.
• Communication tools: Use multiple modes of communication to express expectations and feedback.
• Collaborative problem-solving: Involve children in resolving conflicts using their preferred intelligences.

How Does Gardner’s Theory Align with the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS)?

Gardner’s theory aligns well with the EYFS framework:

• Holistic development: Both emphasise the importance of nurturing all aspects of a child’s development.
• Unique child: EYFS’s focus on the unique child resonates with MI theory’s recognition of individual intelligence profiles.
• Enabling environments: EYFS’s emphasis on creating enabling environments aligns with MI theory’s call for diverse learning opportunities.
• Learning and development: Both frameworks recognise the interconnected nature of different areas of learning and development.

The revised EYFS framework (Department for Education, 2021) incorporates elements that reflect multiple intelligences theory, particularly in its approach to observational assessment and personalised learning.

What is Howard Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences?

Howard Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences proposes that human intelligence is not a single, fixed entity but comprises several distinct types of intelligence:

• Definition: Intelligence is the ability to process information and solve problems in various contexts.
• Key principle: Each person possesses a unique profile of strengths across different intelligences.
• Educational implication: Learning should be tailored to engage diverse intelligences, moving beyond traditional linguistic and logical-mathematical focuses.
• Developmental aspect: Intelligences can be nurtured and strengthened over time.

Gardner first proposed this theory in his 1983 book “Frames of Mind”, challenging the traditional view of intelligence as measured by IQ tests (Gardner, 1983). The theory has since significantly influenced educational practices, particularly in Early Years settings.

What are the 9 Intelligences of Howard Gardner?

Howard Gardner initially identified seven intelligences, later adding two more:

1. Linguistic: Ability to use language effectively, both orally and in writing.
2. Logical-mathematical: Capacity to understand the underlying principles of some kind of causal system.
3. Musical: Skill in the performance, composition, and appreciation of musical patterns.
4. Bodily-kinesthetic: Ability to use one’s whole body or parts of the body to solve problems or create products.
5. Spatial: Capacity to recognize and use the patterns of wide space and more confined areas.
6. Interpersonal: Capacity to understand the intentions, motivations, and desires of other people.
7. Intrapersonal: Capacity to understand oneself, to appreciate one’s feelings, fears and motivations.
8. Naturalistic: Ability to recognize, categorize and draw upon certain features of the environment.
9. Existential: Sensitivity and capacity to tackle deep questions about human existence.

Gardner later added naturalistic intelligence in 1995 and proposed existential intelligence in 1999 (Gardner, 1999). These intelligences are not fixed; individuals can develop strengths in various areas throughout their lives.

References

• Armstrong, T. (2009). Multiple intelligences in the classroom (3rd ed.). ASCD.
• Gürkan, T (2019). Integrating Multiple Intelligences into Daily Plans: A Preschool Example. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 189(5), 823-835.
• Department for Education. (2021). Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework–2
• Education Scotland. (2020). Curriculum for Excellence: Early level experiences and outcomes. https://education.gov.scot/curriculum-for-excellence/curriculum-for-excellence-documents/experiences-and-outcomes/
• Edwards, C., Gandini, L., & Forman, G. (2012). The Hundred Languages of Children: The Reggio Emilia Experience in Transformation (3rd ed.). Praeger.
• Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.
• Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. Basic Books.
• Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple intelligences: New horizons in theory and practice. Basic Books.
• Gardner, H., Feldman, D. H., & Krechevsky, M. (1998). Project Spectrum: Early learning activities. Teachers College Press.
• Gardner, H., & Moran, S. (2006). The science of multiple intelligences theory: A response to Lynn Waterhouse. Educational Psychologist, 41(4), 227-232.
• Greenberg, M. T., Domitrovich, C. E., Weissberg, R. P., & Durlak, J. A. (2017). Social and emotional learning as a public health approach to education. The Future of Children, 27(1), 13-32.
• International Baccalaureate Organization. (2022). The Primary Years Programme: From principles into practice. https://www.ibo.org/programmes/primary-years-programme/curriculum/
• Katz, L. G., & Chard, S. C. (2000). Engaging children’s minds: The project approach (2nd ed.). Ablex Publishing Corporation.
• Kornhaber, M. L. (2004). Multiple intelligences: From the ivory tower to the dusty classroom—but why? Teachers College Record, 106(1), 67-76.
• Martinez, S. L., & Stager, G. S. (2019). Invent to learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom (2nd ed.). Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.
• Schellenberg, E. G. (2004). Music lessons enhance IQ. Psychological Science, 15(8), 511-514.
• Shearer, C. B., & Karanian, J. M. (2020). The neuroscience of intelligence: Empirical support for the theory of multiple intelligences? In Trends in Neuroscience and Education (pp. 211-223). Springer.
• Sternberg, R. J. (1983). How much Gall is too much gall? Review of Frames of Mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Contemporary Education Review, 2(3), 215-224.
• Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Culture and intelligence. American Psychologist, 59(5), 325-338.
• UNESCO. (2023). Early childhood care and education. https://www.unesco.org/en/education/early-childhood
• Waterhouse, L. (2006). Multiple intelligences, the Mozart effect, and emotional intelligence: A critical review. Educational Psychologist, 41(4), 207-225.
• White, J. (2008). Illusory intelligences? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42(3-4), 611-630.

Further Reading and Research

Recommended Articles

• Davis, K., Christodoulou, J., Seider, S., & Gardner, H. (2011). The theory of multiple intelligences. In R.J. Sternberg & S.B. Kaufman (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence (pp. 485-503). Cambridge University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-12794-024
• Gardner, H., & Moran, S. (2006). The science of multiple intelligences theory: A response to Lynn Waterhouse. Educational Psychologist, 41(4), 227-232. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15326985ep4104_2
• Shearer, C. B., & Karanian, J. M. (2017). The neuroscience of intelligence: Empirical support for the theory of multiple intelligences? Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 6, 211-223. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949317300030
• Armstrong, T. (2018). Multiple intelligences in the classroom (4th ed.): Chapter 1. American Psychological Association. https://files.ascd.org/staticfiles/ascd/pdf/siteASCD/publications/books/Multiple-Intelligences-in-the-Classroom-4th-Edition-Sample-Chapters.pdf
• Almeida, L. S., Prieto, M. D., Ferreira, A. I., Bermejo, M. R., Ferrando, M., & Ferrándiz, C. (2010). Intelligence assessment: Gardner multiple intelligence theory as an alternative. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(3), 225-230. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608009001071

Recommended Books

• Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple Intelligences: New Horizons in Theory and Practice. Basic Books. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Multiple-Intelligences-Horizons-Theory-Practice/dp/0465047688
  • This book provides an updated overview of Gardner’s theory, including practical applications for education.
• Armstrong, T. (2018). Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom (4th ed.). ASCD. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Multiple-Intelligences-Classroom-Thomas-Armstrong/dp/1416625097
  • Offers practical strategies for applying MI theory in educational settings, with a focus on classroom applications.
• Campbell, L., Campbell, B., & Dickinson, D. (2003). Teaching and Learning Through Multiple Intelligences (3rd ed.). Pearson. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Teaching-Learning-Through-Multiple-Intelligences/dp/0205363903
  • Provides detailed lesson plans and activities for incorporating MI theory into various subject areas.
• Hoerr, T. R. (2000). Becoming a Multiple Intelligences School. ASCD. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Becoming-Multiple-Intelligences-School-Hoerr/dp/0871203650
  • Offers guidance for school leaders on how to implement MI theory at an institutional level.
• Kagan, S., & Kagan, M. (1998). Multiple Intelligences: The Complete MI Book. Kagan Cooperative Learning. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Multiple-Intelligences-Complete-Spencer-Kagan/dp/1879097451
  • Provides a comprehensive overview of MI theory along with numerous practical activities and strategies.

Recommended Websites

• Project Zero – Harvard Graduate School of Education: https://pz.harvard.edu/
  • Offers research, resources, and professional development opportunities related to multiple intelligences and other educational theories.
• Multiple Intelligences Oasis: https://www.multipleintelligencesoasis.org/
  • Howard Gardner’s official website for multiple intelligences, featuring articles, research, and practical applications.
• ASCD – Multiple Intelligences: https://ascd.org/blogs/understanding-multiple-intelligences-for-the-classroom
  • Provides articles, videos, and webinars on applying multiple intelligences in educational settings.
• Edutopia – Multiple Intelligences: https://www.edutopia.org/multiple-intelligences-research
  • Offers practical articles and videos on implementing MI theory in classrooms.
• TeachingEnglish – British Council: https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/professional-development/teachers/knowing-subject/d-h/multiple-intelligence
  • Provides resources and lesson plans for applying MI theory in language teaching contexts.

Download this Article as a PDF

Download this article as a PDF so you can revisit it whenever you want. We’ll email you a download link.

You’ll also get notification of our FREE Early Years TV videos each week.

Get your PDF Download and FREE Early Years TV Updates

To cite this article use:

Early Years TV Howard Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences Theory: A Guide for Early Years. Available at: https://www.earlyyears.tv/howard-gardners-multiple-intelligences-theory-a-guide-for-early-years (Accessed: 07 September 2024).

Kathy Brodie

Kathy Brodie is an Early Years Professional, Trainer and Author of multiple books on Early Years Education and Child Development. She is the founder of Early Years TV and the Early Years Summit.

Kathy’s Author Profile